Thursday, January 28, 2010

The Catcher in the Rye is gone: JD Salinger Dead at 91

News recap by Danielle, Guest Commentary by LG

BBC News reported today that beloved American novelist JD Salinger, 91, has died of natural causes:
The reclusive writer died of natural causes at his home in the state of New Hampshire, his son said.

The Catcher In The Rye, first published in 1951, is a tale of teenage angst. It has become one of the most influential American novels of the modern era.

Soon after its publication, Salinger shunned the fame it brought and became a recluse for the rest of his life.

Read the rest of the announcement HERE

BBC has also posted Salinger’s intriguing obituary.

I first read The Catcher in the Rye when I moved to New York. A boy I was dating touted it as his favorite book of all time. I stopped seeing him before I could return his worn, tattered copy, but it was a good acquisition for my shelf.

I haven’t touched the book since the summer of 2006, and even though I found Holden Caulfield to be an interesting character, I probably would have related much easier to him if I had a) been a boy or b) been much younger. Regardless, I enjoyed the novel, and it’s one I’ll probably read again someday.

More mythical than the novel, though, is the author himself. Salinger was a reclusive nut, to put it bluntly. He wrote one great novel and then disappeared into oblivion. But, I must say, I’m glad he’s taken actions to protect his name and his novel, effectively blocking the publication of 60 Years Later: Coming Through the Rye, a follow-up to the classic novel. He also refused to sell the film rights to Rye. Kudos to you, Salinger. I think a film adaptation of the book would be an atrocious rape of the text. It’s just one of those books I’d never want to see on the screen if only because it’s so iconic.

The last interview Salinger ever gave was in 1980—before I was even born. Nevertheless, the author lives on as a literary legend, a figure whose words have meant so much to untold numbers of adolescents around the country—and possibly the world.

Word has it that 15 manuscripts have been found in the deceased author’s home. I can only pray that heirs won’t violate his wishes and try to publish those books.

Though the author has passed, long live his text. Unpublished.

Have you read The Catcher in the Rye? Did it have an effect on you?

Apple's iPad Creates Quite the Stir

Yesterday, Apple officially released the iPad: the newest e-book reader to join the market. But it's not only an e-book reader; it's a "tablet" that Apple claims is "the best way to experience the web, emails, photos, and video. Hands down."

At 1.5 pounds and half an inch thickness, the 9.7-inch LED-backlit display has a Multi-touch screen and can do just about anything. And as such, rumors are circulating that the iPad will effectively kill the Kindle. Blogger Scopique over at Cedarstreet discusses:

Now that the iPad is out of the iBag, some people are talking about how the iPad’s iBook e-book reader will deep-six the Kindle.

I’m not so sure about that.

First, the price. A friend of mine just paid $259 for a Kindle. Compare that with $499 for the iPad’s basic model. This is kind of a throw-away point, because anyone who wants to boost the iPad will tell you that it’s more then just an e-book reader, so the price is justified. I suppose on some level, yes, this is true, but for people like my father, who just want to read a book, $499 is a bit steep.

[...]

Still not sold? Consider the late Ted Kennedy. Sen. Kennedy’s book True Compass was used as an example during Apple’s presentation of iBook. On the display, the book was seen as listing for $14.99. I immediately jumped over to the Kindle store to check on Amazon’s e-book price for the same tome: $9.99. It’s good to see the Apple Tax is still in effect.

Read more HERE

Scopique has some excellent points, all of which are related to the big green (aka $$$), something our society deems most imperative. So will the lay person spend more on an iPad, when they can do basically the same things with a Kindle? Unless they're technologically obsessed, I doubt it, too.
The New York Times, however, discusses how the upricing could effect the publishing industry positively, despite its disgruntled customers (as well as other things):
With a few notable exceptions, the print world welcomed Apple’s new iPad on Wednesday, eager to tap into the 125 million customers who already have iTunes accounts and are predisposed to buying more content from Apple.

“We have learned that it is never wise to stand between a consumer and a preference” for how they get their content, said John Makinson, chief executive of Penguin Group, the book publisher.

The iPad may offer an even more attractive prospect: the chance to reset the downward spiral in e-book prices.

[...]

“We have learned that it is never wise to stand between a consumer and a preference” for how they get their content, said John Makinson, chief executive of Penguin Group, the book publisher.

The iPad may offer an even more attractive prospect: the chance to reset the downward spiral in e-book prices.

Read the rest of the article HERE

I'm still unsure how I feel about all this. I just recently gave in to buying a Sony E-Reader for work and am not a fan of these e-readers in general (though I must admit that I love it for submissions. It makes me life so much easier!). So, more to come from me on this.

What do you think of the iPad?

Just for kicks

Just thought this was a cool photo for a Thursday morning:




Thanks for leading me to it, Tara!

Wednesday, January 27, 2010

The Sensitivity of Literary Editing


This week, the Recalcitrant Scrivener blogged about editing and revising a manuscript from both an editor's and an author's point of view:

Editing is a sensitive issue—for writers, for editors, for everyone involved. Virtually all writers can benefit from working with a good editor. But note: the key terms here are “with” and “good.” Which is to say, the writer and editor have to be well matched—they have to understand each other and be able to communicate. What most writers resent is an editor who has a very different view of the trajectory of their work and then attacks the manuscript in a vigorous manner based on that view.

Most notably, editors are essential for serving as a sounding board for ideas, catching unintentional repetitions, and identifying passages and plot developments that don’t work. Word by word revisions are less important, and in some cases counterproductive. Finishing the manuscript of a novel is after all very different from writing and editing a magazine or newspaper article.

Read the rest of the blog post HERE


The Recalcitrant Scrivener goes on to discuss two examples of unacceptable literary editing, one by an editor (Raymond Carver's editor) and one by an author (Jack Kerouac).

I'd never heard these two particular examples myself but the idea of literary editing has always been intriguing to me (duh, my job), but editing literary fiction is very different from what I've been doing thus far in my career. I took two classes in college on the very topic and it's amazing how varied opinions can be on what is and isn't go editorial-wise and how authorial intent can be so subjective, especially if the author isn't there to set editors or readers straight.

Personally, I think the key to being a good editor is understanding the authorial intent by communicating with the author first-hand and then doing everything he/she can to help the author achieve that intent in a way that everyone is happy with. While that's a very simple concept, it can be difficult in execution. But for me, it's always, always the goal. It's the author's book. Not mine. I just do the best I can to guide.

Tuesday, January 26, 2010

2000-2010: The Decade of YA

Amazon.com Omnivoracious blogger Heidi Broadhead has nicknamed the past ten years "The YA decade." And I've gotta say, I'd agree.

Broadhead writes:

No other genre (except maybe graphic novels) has grown and changed as much during the last decade as young adult fiction. Inspired by Harry Potter (and probably a little bit by Lemony Snicket and Artemis Fowl), a whole generation of voracious readers emerged, and a whole new group of writers came up with stories to keep them reading well into their teens.

Over the past few years, we've seen a lot of YA controversies: Is the drinking in this book appropriate for young adult readers? What's the deal with these adult readers of YA? Should Rebecca wear the red dress or the blue dress to the prom? Should she go with the dark faerie or the newly-made-vampire geek boy?

Read the rest of her post HERE

YA has just gotten more and more controversial over the years, with darker themes and edgier characters fighting their way to the surface. Broadhead goes on to spotlight eight authors who have helped to shape the genre in the past decade.

Laurie Halse Anderson and Scott Westerfeld are my personal favorites from this particular list. Broadhead describes Anderson as "writing about the things you're not supposed to talk about; enduring a book ban now and again with grace; general awesomeness," and Westerfeld as "supernatural teen romance crossover; author as celebrity; book-writing mommy; person who dreams about something and writes it down and it becomes a best-selling series."

Both of these descriptions are pretty spot on (minus the "book-writing mommy" which I don't quite get to be honest), and they'd absolutely be on my list of the most influential authors of the past decade. Some of her others would be on my list as well (Stephanie Meyer, anyone?). I'd also toss on my list Elizabeth Scott for Living Dead Girl and Stephen Chbosky for Perks of Being a Wallflower (technically 1999 but close enough) to name a couple.

But one of Broadhead's choices is surprising to me: Meg Cabot, most famous for her book turned movie The Princess Diaries. Broadhead describes Cabot as "cheeky girl humor; writing one of the first super-series; constantly encouraging aspiring writers." While that description is mostly accurate, I don't see Cabot as doing anything particularly exciting or inventive. She's basically chick-lit for teens and I don't think I'd call her books a "super-series," let alone the first one.

But oh well. Different strokes for different folks.

Also, check out this interesting article by Mark Haverstock on what makes YA so controversial and why it's changed so drastically, originally a magazine article published in the June 2004 issue of Children's Writer/Newsletter of Writing and Publishing Trends.


Who would be on YOUR list of the most influential YA authors in the past decade?

Monday, January 25, 2010

Guest Blogger, LG: Trend Alert--A New Way Cover It Up

Have you ever found yourself caught in the middle of an argument where one person adamantly claims that publishing is a dying industry, waving a Kindle or e-Reader in the air, while the other screams in horror and clutches his or her physical book tightly?

Oh, you haven’t? Lucky you.

But those of us who love our books--and can’t live without our technology--don’t have to be caught in the middle anymore!

BookBook has created the ultimate technology- and book-lover’s computer cover. It’s a practical and quirkily-stylish way to protect your beloved MacBook in the style of a rare leather-bound hard back book. It would also look pretty good on your shelves next to your other books—especially if you’re at risk for being burglarized. (I kid, I kid.) They’re pricey at $79.99, but they’re also hand-made and the website claims, “No two are alike.” Pretty dang cool.

Now if only they’d make these for e-Readers!

The BookBook is made for 13- and 15-inch MacBook and MacBook Pro. Keep your eyes on this small start-up company. They’re sure to be coming up with some great ideas in the near future.


Check out the BookBook HERE


About the blogger: LG is a 20-something writer and blogger from Alaska currently living in New York City. She works in publishing and television production to pay the bills, but continues to write, read, and study pop culture and technology trends to her heart's content in her free time. Visit her blog, "Big Girl, Bigger City" to read about her daily misadventures.


Thanks for joining us at Reading Between the Lines, LG!


If you or anyone you know would like to guest blog for RBtL, please inquire via e-mail.

Bloomsbury Apologizes for Whitewashing...Again

Publisher's Marketplace linked to the Bloomsbury website today where the publisher apologizes for their most recent whitewashing scandal on Magic Under Glass by Jaclyn Dolamore. The website says:
Bloomsbury is ceasing to supply copies of the US edition of Magic Under Glass. The jacket design has caused offense and we apologize for our mistake. Copies of the book with a new jacket design will be available shortly.

But why did Bloomsbury even bother whitewashing again when it cause so much offense with their publication of Liar (discussed HERE)? Are they just in it for the publicity and whitewashing intentionally? Or were editors and designers just plain careless?

With the stir that's been caused by this escalating process, it's anyone's guess. Let's just home they mean it this time and don't whitewash again. Three strikes and you're out, Bloomsbury.